Guest post by Greg Schmalz
With unemployment at nearly 12 million and many businesses cutting back to stay afloat, sports seems to be totally oblivious to what's happening around them.
Player salaries continue to be in the millions and it's a matter of how high will you go. Manny Ramirez for instance, who played last season with the Los Angeles Dodgers, rejected a $25 million deal for one season. Both the New York Yankees and Mets have built new stadiums. And the stadiums keep going up.
Which brings me to the new stadium that the New York Giants and Jets are partners in as they will begin play in their new confines in 2010.
Instead of selling naming rights to a corporation the way the Mets have with Citigroup for $400 million over 20 years, the owners have decided to offer Personal Seat Licenses where season ticket holders can buy the seats and have ownership to those seats, yet still have to pay their usual ticket price to see a game.
And while the Giants and Jets will still share the new stadium, some internal marketing knuckleheads believe they will have a "home field advantage" because through modern technology they will able to change the stadium from the Giants red and blue colors to the Jets green and white.
I grew up as a sportswriter in my teens and was assigned the Jets beat back in the seventies. They played at Shea Stadium in Flushing, New York in those days before joining the Giants at the Meadowlands in New Jersey. When I stopped covering the team after the 1979 season, I became a season ticket-holder. I still have tickets, but not for long, because now the team is reaching out to me to buy Personal Seat Licenses (PSL's) for the new stadium.
I received my information about the new plan two weeks ago. Based on my current location in the lower level, the licenses would cost me between $10-15,000 per seat. I am on the borderline of two price ranges. I briefly looked at the package, chuckled to myself and set it aside.
Then I received a phone call from a marketing rep (Michael Barrett) Saturday afternoon who went on to say that he will be my personal contact and will walk me through the process. He asked if I had seen the material, did I have any questions etc. I got him to confirm my suspicions on pricing etc. and then I told him I will probably pass.
The kid freaked out (I am assuming he was probably early thirties). Naturally, he would not take no for an answer and made it sound like I was missing the deal of a lifetime.
He proceeded to pitch me how the Jets came close this season, were 8-3 at one time and that a new stadium is what's needed to get them over the hump and how could I miss out on such a great opportunity.
I told him I had written Mr. Johnson a three-page letter months ago when they announced their intention of offering PSL's that they are alienating the fan base. Get this, the kid went on to say that they (the team) are putting money into the team and the facilities to build a championship team. And that recent Super Bowl champions Pittsburgh, New England and Tampa Bay all won championships after building a new stadium. Really!
Sure, Tampa Bay whipped Oakland, 48-21, in January 2003. But they haven't won since. In fact, Bucs coach Jon Gruden was fired in Tampa Bay.
If that's the case, what's happened to Houston at Reliant Stadium? Or Miami in Dolphin Stadium? The Dolphins haven't appeared in the Super Bowl since they were blasted by Joe Montana and the San Francisco Forty-Niners, 38-16, in Dan Marino's rookie season of 1984. Or how about Detroit at Ford Field? Didn't they go 0-16 this past season? How bad would they have been without the new stadium?
So how much does the home field make a difference? Well, Carolina had the best home record last season at 8-0. Yet, the Panthers were soundly beaten by Arizona in the playoffs. The Giants, Atlanta and Tennessee were all 7-1. But the Giants lost (at home) to Philadelphia, Atlanta lost to Arizona and Tennessee fell (at home) to Baltimore. So much for the home field advantage.
My recollection is that the Super Bowl is played on a neutral site. Never has the game been played at the site of an NFL team participating in the championship game. Sure, the 1980 game between Pittsburgh and Los Angeles was played in Pasadena at the Rose Bowl and the 1985 game between San Francisco and Miami was played at Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto, California.
But to win the Super Bowl, you need to win on the road. Nineteen teams had winning records at home this past season but only 12 had winning road records. Those Jets were 5-3 at home and 4-4 on the road.
Even if the marketing rep was right, who in their right mind would spend that kind of money in this economy? In addition to the PSL's, the ticket prices are jumping from $90 to $145, a hefty increase.
But I do have choices. I don't have to pay the PSL if I opt for a seat in the nosebleeds. Better yet. I can watch any game on DirecTV and when the Jets are losing, just switch the channel. And if I want to spend $20-30,000, I might as well put a down payment on a second home.
It's come time to say "enough is enough."
My understanding Lunch Boy is that I would have access to purchase other entertainment tickets. But they (the Jets) have already left a bad taste in my mouth. They got rid of the coach (Mangini) and now Favre is gone. And now, I am gone.
Whew…this was a long rant. You should have asked Michael Barrett if you get reimbursed/profit from the ticket sales to concerts and other events held in the stadium that are not related to football. Or, would you at least get first dibs on the seats when your favorite band is coming to town. The answers to those questions would have pissed you off even more.
As an aside, I was going to be a pro-athlete and would have loved to have turned down a 25 mm contract in order to wait for something better. Turns out I wasn’t tall enough, strong enough or athletic enough. Oh well.
So true. The idea of personal seat licenses at the prices they’re at is beyond me.