How come?

c452279cc538120aa9fe397f96351cacHow come the countless incendiary comments made by a certain presidential contender are not only found acceptable by 50 percent of the electorate, but applauded for “telling like it is?”  I ask because, if any one of those racial, gender and religious slurs were to be uttered by any CEO of any company in America, there would be immediate consequences.

Could you imagine GE’s Jeff Immelt calling his CMO “Miss Piggy?”

How about Mark Zuckerberg telling his Latino and black employees their neighborhoods are “hellholes”?

What about Jamie Dimon informing Muslims employees at JP Morgan Chase he’d be working with community leaders to close their mosques?

I guarantee the boards of GE, Facebook and JP Morgan Chase, respectively, would demand their immediate resignations. And, I’d be willing to bet a large portion of said presidential contender’s base would be fully supportive of penalizing such unacceptable behavior.

So, why don’t the same rules apply to the man running for chief executive of our country? How can any minority voter whose sensibilities have been repeatedly attacked still stand by their man? It defies logic. And, yet, there it is.

The larger question I’m grappling with is this: If the presidential contender should be sworn in as our next president, will he advocate for a return to the future when it comes to political correctness in the workplace?

Will he lobby for banishing the ethics and moral codes that guide many (but, not all) of America’s business and industry?

And what about his base? Will they think it’s now acceptable to behave like Don Draper, Roger Sterling and Duck Phillips (love, love, love the nickname Duck, BTW)?

I miss quite a bit when it comes to pundits weighing in on the circus-like spectacle that is the presidential election. But, I’ve yet to hear anyone opine on the possible return of crassness in Corporate America.

Fully half of the electorate want change. And they want it now. But, will that change also include turning back the clock 60 years when it comes to how we treat one another at work?

I worry because when the leader leads, the followers follow.

6 thoughts on “How come?

  1. Spot on, Hospitality Executive. I could have taken the easy way out and blamed Auto Correct for changing Dimon to Diamond, but I won’t. I should have caught the mistake before the blog was posted. But, I didn’t.

    But, here’s what separates me from the CEOs I mentioned as well as the “certain presidential contender” to whom I alluded: I publicly apologized.

    Now, back to you Hospitality Executive. Assuming you’re human and have made at least one mistake in your life, how about sharing it with our readers AND apologizing for it? Ball’s in your court.

  2. Word to the wise- if you are going to write about one of the biggest executives in the country, at least get his name right. Kind of ironic coming from the guy that pokes fun of marketers on his blog when they make similar errors.

  3. I’m more interested in knowing the opinions of human resource managers. Will the workplace behavior rules change if Trump is elected?

  4. The image is representative of turning back the clocks IN GENERAL if Trump is elected, not to a specific time.

  5. Great stuff, but one thing kind of confuses me — the cartoon says “party like it’s 1856.” Fair enough, but your post points to 1956 as a time when men could still get away with blatant misogyny, racism, xenophobia and religious oppression.

    As for why Trump gets away with it, he may not know what he’s talking about but he does know the darkness of human souls more than we can admit. He also isn’t answerable to anyone. Yet.

    Best, P-I-T-A Content/Copy Guy